Liquor & Gaming Specialists

  • Home
  • News
  • Liquor Licensing
    • Minors on Licensed Premises in Queensland
    • Extended Trading Hours for Licensed Premises
    • Risk Assessed Management Plan
    • FAQ
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Links
  • Call us on 07 3252 4066

25 March 2024 by Diarmuid Deans

Easter and ANZAC Day Trading Hours 2024

Good Friday – 29 March 2024

Trading hours and conditions for all licensed premises in Queensland are set out below.

Thursday Night (Good Friday Eve): all premises must cease service at 12 midnight. The 30 minute grace period for consumption of drinks on the premises still applies.

Good Friday up to Midnight: if you do not normally serve meals on the premises, you will be able to enjoy a day off.

Premises offering a meals service may open at the usual time on Good Friday, but liquor may only be sold in association with a meal prepared on the premises and served in a part of the premises ordinarily set aside for dining.

Adult entertainment is not permitted on any licensed premises in the 24 hour period from midnight to midnight on Good Friday.

Midnight on Good Friday onwards: normal trading resumes. Premises with extended trading hours approval may open at midnight and trade under their normal conditions until the approved closing time.

Normal trading hours and conditions apply for the remainder of the Easter period.

ANZAC-square-brisbane-150

ANZAC Day – 25 April 2024

All licensed premises must cease liquor service at 12 midnight on 24 April, with the usual 30 minute grace period. Gaming must also cease at midnight.

Up to 1 pm on ANZAC day liquor may be sold in association with a meal, prepared on the premises and served in a part of the premises ordinarily set aside for dining. No takeaway liquor may be sold before 1 pm on ANZAC day.

RSL clubs and licensed premises catering for ANZAC day services or RSL functions can commence trading from 5 am on ANZAC day, subject to certain conditions. Please see the OLGR Factsheet for full details.

If your require a temporary extended hours permit for Anzac Day you must lodge the application at least 21 days in advance, which means by close of business on 4 April 2024, the Thursday after Easter. You can make an application through the OLGR Client Portal, or by completing an application form and sending it to OLGR.

Filed Under: News Tagged With: compliance, Extended Hours, restaurant

29 March 2019 by Matthew Jones

Understanding Queensland Liquor Advertising Restrictions

We regularly advise liquor licence holders in Queensland on how to promote their licensed business without contravening the restrictions placed on licensees by Section 142ZZC of the Liquor Act. Recent communications from OLGR suggest there may be a change in how this section will be interpreted, adding to the already complicated process of deciding whether or not your advertising and promotions are acceptable.

To help you navigate the minefield that is Section 142ZZC we have drawn up a decision making tool for you to use. Please bear in mind that this is a general tool only and may not take into account all the factors associated with your planned advertisement or promotion. If you require specific advice, please call our office on 07 3252 4066.

Feel free to distribute this tool to friends and associates if you think it is useful.

Download the Free Liquor Advertising Decision Making Tool (2019)

Filed Under: News Tagged With: advertising, compliance, licensing strategy

1 May 2015 by Diarmuid Deans

New Laws to Impact Restaurants

Licensed restaurants have been the target of a number of OLGR initiatives over the years, and the most recent change, effective from 1 July 2015, will see the introduction of some of the toughest rules yet. Aimed at any restaurant trading as a bar, licensees will be required to comply with principal activity requirements for each trading day.

What does this mean for restaurant licensees?

Up until the mid-1990s a restaurant, or on premises meals, liquor licence restricted the supply of liquor to in association with a meal and some operators may remember ensuring patrons were intending to dine before serving a drink. However, since then the principal activity, or what used to be the primary purpose, provision of meals prepared, and served to be eaten, on the licensed premises has been used as an assessment of compliance. In effect, if a restaurant could demonstrate it was generally maintaining its principal activity, there was no limit on the amount of liquor that could be sold not in association with a meal.

The upcoming changes, part of the Safe Night Out Legislation Amendment Bill 2014, will tighten things up by requiring restaurant licensees to comply with principal activity requirements on the basis of each trading day. In other words, if a number of patrons attend for a drink and not a meal, there must have been enough dining patrons throughout that one day to ensure that most patrons consumed a meal on premises.

The concerns about these changes are obvious according to Liquor & Gaming Specialists Director Matthew Jones. Licensees will be expected to monitor the number of patrons consuming meals and the number not doing so. How will a busy restaurant owner, who sells numerous coffees and other beverages, ensure that these patrons do not outnumber, or even equate to, the number of patrons consuming meals?

Other changes, which will perhaps affect fewer restaurants, include the winding back of extended trading hours. From July 1, all existing and new restaurants will be limited to 1 am trading, regardless of any current approval. There are whispers that this reduction in available hours will include a reduction in the annual licence fee uplift, but this is yet to be confirmed.

For the more seriously impacted licensees, strategies to mitigate the effects include changing licence types: bar, caf and commercial hotel licences are the likely alternatives. For the rest, it looks like yet another compliance headache.

Filed Under: News Tagged With: amendments, compliance, principal activity, restaurant

3 June 2014 by Diarmuid Deans

Why Lockouts Don’t Work

The lockout laws introduced in Kings Cross in late February this year have been heralded as a success, with numbers of violent assaults dropping by half since the introduction of the laws. The changes in crime rates after adopting similar lockout laws for Newcastle, over a substantially longer period of 5 years, averaged at a 30% reduction in crime. While both of these areas seem to reflect positive changes in behaviour caused, or at least influenced, by restrictions on late-night trading of bars and hotels, the statistics lose much of their effect when viewed alongside the crime rates of other areas in New South Wales. In the same period in the similar-sized cities of Penrith, Wollongong, Sutherland Shire and Gosford, similar or greater reductions in crime rates were recorded, despite the absence of any similar lockout provisions for liquor establishments; suggesting lockouts don’t work as the provisions in Newcastle had little effect in bringing down the rates of violent crimes.

With little demonstrable direct impact on the rates of violent behaviour, the negative effects of the lockout laws may outweigh the supposed benefits that they bring. The economic impact of reduced trading hours is a cause of concern for many business owners and the reduced activity of Sydney’s iconic nightlife precincts threatens the city’s tourism sector.

Further issues with the lockout provisions could be that rather than promoting responsible drinking habits, the restrictions encourage patrons to drink more in a shorter time period, or simply travel to locations unaffected by the legislation. NSW Assistant Commissioner Mark Murdoch admitted to the ABC that the new rules could “just move the crowds and violence elsewhere” . Peter Miller, Principal Research Fellow at Deakin University, also acknowledged the potential for the implementation of restrictions in some areas to simply move problems to other areas, which may not be as well-equipped to deal with them.

Patrons have regularly been shown to travel across the Queensland border for the increased trading hours offered by northern NSW venues, and Gold Coast Mayor Tom Tate has already vocalised his ambition to capitalise on NSW’s restrictions, hoping to tempt NSW patrons across the border and turn the Gold Coast into “Australia’s Las Vegas”. Thus while it may appear that crime rates decrease in areas affected by the lockout provisions, it may simply be that the violence has been relocated to another area. Logically, this increased congregation of patrons in an area may lead to increased levels of alcohol-fuelled violence, with crowding at licensed venues identified as a leading propagator of violent activity.

Conversely, decreases in the level of patronage of a given precinct will logically reduce the number of incidents in that area. Statistics on the reduction in patron numbers since the introduction of the lockout in Sydney don’t appear to receive the same attention in the media as those relating to decreases in violent behaviour. The reality appears to be that since the O’Farrell crackdown, crowds have deserted the Cross by up to 30%, with other anecdotal reports depicting the desertion of previously renowned nightlife spots.

Identified instigators and catalysts of alcohol-related violence include diverse factors such as personal biology, type of liquor consumed, characteristic of the licensed premises and surrounds and the culture of the community1. With the lockout provisions focusing on just one of the multitude of factors shown to increase the chances of violent activity, it can only be said that the provisions are a poor attempt to remedy a much larger social problem. A number of owners and managers of licensed venues throughout NSW attribute the general decrease in violent behaviour they have witnessed to their habit of self-policing; adopting strategies ranging from providing free water and food for patrons and limiting the types of drinks they sell after a certain time .

What is needed is not a wide-reaching ban on the sale of liquor, but more targeted attempts to change the behaviour of both managers of licensed venues and “high-risk” patrons. This could be achieved with a mix of increased education and awareness of alcohol-related violence, and incentives for operators of licensed venues to self-regulate and adopt responsible behaviour, with punishment reserved for offenders and for those who do not or cannot sufficiently manage patron violence.

1. Pernanen, K. (1998). Prevention of alcohol-related violence. Contemporary Drug Problems, 25(3), 477–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/009145099802500305^

Filed Under: News Tagged With: compliance, DSP, Extended Hours, lockout, safe night out

21 April 2014 by Diarmuid Deans

Minors On Licensed Premises – Compliance Issues

Section 155 of the Liquor Act has been around in its current form for ages.  It creates the offence of allowing an underage person on licensed premises, which carries significant maximum penalties – 100 penalty units ($130.55 per unit = $13,055 for individuals, multiplied by 5 for companies).  It is also one of the offences which attracts on-the-spot fines.  We had a client cop one of these recently when a couple of minors managed to sneak into his detached bottleshop while staff were distracted – $1100 (2014 penalty).

The way the section works is that it first states the offence, then creates a series of exemptions to it.  Most people are aware, for example, that if a minor is accompanied by a responsible adult, then that’s OK. Well, mostly OK, the exemption isn’t available after 5pm in a nightclub. Other exemptions cover minors working at the premises or doing work experience, minors residing on the premises and minors eating a meal. The whole section is extracted below this article.

So what’s changed?  Over the last couple of weeks we have have received a number of calls from clients who have been visited by OLGR compliance officers who have been ‘reminding’ them that if a minor comes into the premises to purchase takeaway food, or to have a coffee or milkshake, then that’s a breach of section 155 unless the licensee has made application for and received a specific approval from OLGR. In recent years we have all seen the emergence and growth of our cafe culture, and young people enjoying a skinny cap or triple shot soy latte etc. However, more and more of these venues have become licensed and when the year 11 or 12 student pops in for their morning fix before school the licensee, inadvertently, has a problem.

The other common scenario is take away food.  Many licensees don’t realise that if Mum sends her 15 year old in to pick up the food, the licensee commits an offence by allowing the minor on the premises.

Fortunately, there’s a solution.  The list of exemptions in section 155 includes paragraph (e) which is in the following terms:

the minor is on the premises for a purpose, and in circumstances, approved by the commissioner or stated in a condition of the licence or permit;

Although for some time now OLGR officers have not been focussing on this area, that’s clearly changed, and we are presently arranging this exemption for a number of clients.  The cost is minimal, so if your customers include young people and you neither wish to exclude them nor risk a fine you should call us for assistance.


Relevant section from the Liquor Act 1992

155 Minors on premises

(1) This section applies to all minors other than an exempt minor.

(2) A licensee, permittee or person in control of the premises to which the licence or permit relates must ensure that a minor is not on the premises.

(3) Also, an employee or agent of the licensee or permittee must not allow a minor to enter the premises to which the licence or permit relates.

(3A) If a minor is on the premises, each of the following persons commits an offence—

(a) the licensee or permittee;

(b) if another person is in control of the premises—the other person;

(c) if an employee or agent of the licensee or permittee allowed the minor to enter the premises—the employee or agent.

Maximum penalty—100 penalty units.

(4) In this section—

exempt minor means a minor on premises to which a licence or permit relates if—

(a) the minor is a resident on the premises; or

(b) the minor is on the premises to—

(i) perform duties as an employee of the owner, or occupier, of the premises or a part of the premises; or

(ii) perform duties in the conduct of a lawful business; or

(iii) perform duties while receiving training for employment or work experience; or

(c) the minor is attending a function being held on the premises; or

(d) the premises are premises to which a community club licence, community other licence, craft beer producer permit or restricted liquor permit relates and the minor’s presence does not contravene the club’s rules or a condition of the licence or permit; or

(e) the minor is on the premises for a purpose, and in circumstances, approved by the commissioner or stated in a condition of the licence or permit; or

(f) the minor—

(i) is eating a meal on the premises; or

(ii) is accompanied by a responsible adult who is responsibly supervising the minor.

(5) However, a minor is not an exempt minor merely because the minor is eating a meal on the premises or accompanied by a responsible adult if—

(a) the minor is on premises after 5p.m.; and

(b) the licence for the premises is a nightclub licence.

This article was updated on 8 November 2018 to reflect the current value of the penalty unit and a change to the rules regarding nightclub licences.

Filed Under: News Tagged With: compliance, minors, restaurant

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next Page »

Search

Recent Posts

  • Christmas & New Year Trading Hours 2024
  • Easter and ANZAC Day Trading Hours 2024
  • OLGR’s Liquor Compliance Strategy

Connect With LGS

Liquor & Gaming Specialists
Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on LinkedInFollow Us on YouTube

Contact Us

Liquor & Gaming Specialists
30 Prospect Street
Fortitude Valley QLD 4006 AU
T: 07 3252 4066
F: 07 3252 1466

Send a Message

Copyright © 2025 · Local Business Marketing and Website Design, Brisbane